| COMMENTARIES |
Uric Acid and Cardiovascular Disease: Risk Factor or Risk Marker?
Thais Coutinho, M.D.1 and Iftikhar Kullo,
M.D. 2, 1Department of Internal Medicine and
2Division of Cardiovascular Diseases,
Mayo Clinic
Rochester
MN
![]() |
![]() |
Introduction
Whether serum uric acid (UA) has an etiologic role in cardiovascular disease continues to be a matter of debate. Whereas several investigators have suggested that UA contributes to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [1,2], hypertension [2], and inflammation [3-5], others have hypothesized that elevation of serum UA is a consequence, not a cause, of vascular disease since UA is a free radical scavenger, and therefore its elevation could represent a physiologic response to increased vascular oxidative stress [6].
Several reports describe an independent association of UA with coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease [7-10], but numerous others have failed to confirm such an association [11-13]. In this commentary we discuss the relationship of UA with risk factors for atherosclerosis, endothelial function, and sub-clinical atherosclerosis.
Serum Uric Acid, Conventional Risk Factors, Metabolic Syndrome, and Inflammation
Higher levels of UA have been associated with hypertension, diabetes, higher low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, elevated serum triglycerides, increased adiposity, and smoking [13,14], and the relationship between UA and CHD may be confounded by these risk factors. We and others have shown that individuals with the metabolic syndrome have significantly higher UA levels than individuals without the syndrome [14,15]. Furthermore, UA levels increase with the increased number of metabolic syndrome components [14]. A possible mechanism for increased UA levels in the metabolic syndrome, a hyperinsulinemic state, may be that insulin stimulates sodium and urate reabsorption in the proximal tubule [16].
Several studies suggest that increased UA levels may represent a systemic inflammatory state. We and others have shown that serum UA is significantly associated with plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, independent of potential confounders such as the conventional CHD risk factors [14,17]. In addition, UA has been shown to have pro-inflammatory effects in vitro, including stimulation of production of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) by human mononuclear cells, and CRP by cultured human vascular cells [4]. However, because serum urate serves as a free-radical scavenger and has anti-oxidant properties [6], elevation of serum UA in the setting of inflammation may be a reactive phenomenon and not a cause of the inflammatory process.
Serum Uric Acid, Endothelial Function, and Hypertension
Previous studies investigating the relationship between UA and flow-mediated dilation, a marker of endothelial function in conduit arteries, have not yielded consistent results. While some reported a significant association [18,19], others suggested that the association of UA and flow-mediated dilation is not independent of the conventional CHD risk factors [20]. We too noted a lack of association between UA and flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery in adults with hypertension [21]. However, UA was independently associated with reactive forearm hyperemic flow, a measure of endothelial function of the microvasculature [21]. We speculate that the association may be due to the increase in UA production in the microcirculation in the setting of ischemia. During periods of ischemia, xanthine oxidase activity in the endothelial microvasculature leads to formation of oxygen free radicals and UA which in turn may impair post-ischemic hyperemia [22,23]. This has motivated investigation of the effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors on microvascular endothelial function. Recently, high dose allopurinol (600 mg) was shown to significantly improve forearm endothelial function, assessed by venous occlusion plethysmography, when compared to lower dose allopurinol (300 mg) and placebo [24].
Serum UA has also been implicated in the development of hypertension given its reported role in the activation of the renin-angiotensin system [25], induction of pre-glomerular arteriolopathy and salt sensitivity [2], and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle [26]. Moreover, it has been show that allopurinol administration can prevent development of hypertension in animal models [27]. Such an association has also been demonstrated in a population-based cohort study performed by Shankar et al. [28], who showed increasing risk of developing hypertension with increasing quartiles of serum uric acid.
Serum Uric Acid and Sub-Clinical Atherosclerosis
The association of serum UA with measures of sub-clinical atherosclerosis, such as carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and coronary artery calcification, is also controversial. While Iribarren et al. [29] observed that UA was not independently associated with carotid IMT in 11,488 patients from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, Kawamoto et al. found an independent association in elderly patients [30]. We recently studied the association of serum UA with sub-clinical coronary atherosclerosis (defined by presence and quantity of coronary calcium measured by electron beam computer tomography), in 1,107 asymptomatic non-Hispanic whites belonging to sibships ascertained on the basis of essential hypertension [31]. Serum UA was associated with presence and quantity of coronary artery calcium after adjustment for age and sex, but not after further adjustment for the conventional CHD risk factors.
Summary
Serum UA is a marker of increased cardiovascular risk, however, given its associations with conventional cardiovascular risk factors and components of the metabolic syndrome, an independent correlation may not be easily demonstrated. An added complexity is the fact that UA has been shown to be involved in pathways of inflammation and also as a free radical scavenger. It is possible that UA plays a role in atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction by mediating some of the adverse effects of known risk factors, in which case pharmacologic lowering of UA may have beneficial effects. Randomized controlled trials using UA-lowering drugs will be necessary to confirm or refute this hypothesis.
References